|
Nov 21, 2024
|
|
|
|
PHL 221 - Critical Thinking and LogicCredits: 4 Instructional Contact Hours: 4
Development of critical thinking skills through the study of formal and informal logic. Analysis of fallacies, methods of clear argumentation, syllogisms, inductive logic, scientific method and rational decision-making.
Prerequisite(s): None Corequisite(s): None Lecture Hours: 60 Lab Hours: 0 Meets MTA Requirement: Humanities Pass/NoCredit: Yes
Outcomes and Objectives
- Demonstrate the difference between philosophical questions, knowledge and ways of thinking and those appropriate to other disciplines.
- Distinguish the kind of reasoning appropriate to philosophy from kinds appropriate to other disciplines.
- State, clarify and exemplify the methodologies of philosophical thinking.
- Use writing to promote learning in all of the above outcomes and objectives.
- Demonstrate a practical understanding of language usage.
- State and explain the nature of the various rhetorical uses of language
- Identify examples of rhetorical uses of language.
- Distinguish cognitive elements in language.
- Demonstrate understanding of the fundamental concepts of the discipline of logic and critical thinking.
- Define the concepts of logic and critical thinking.
- Distinguish examples of logic and critical thinking
- Provide a critical explanation of cases when the concepts are and are not helpful in analyzing examples.
- Demonstrate the ability to evaluate arguments.
- Define, identify and distinguish the various kinds of arguments.
- Evaluate the strengths and weakness of arguments.
- Identify the assumptions necessary to make arguments strong, valid and cogent.
- Explain the logical functions and definitions of logical operators.
- State appropriate logical definitions and functions of these terms.
- Explain why these terms are defined as they are.
- Identify the logic of an argument in written text.
- Develop facility at distinguishing and identifying statement forms such as tautologies, contingencies and contradictions.
- Identify and state the arguments from written texts and put into convention forms such as those of syllogistic logic, truth functional logic and quantificational logic.
- Perform tests for validity by using such methods as truth tables, deductions and syllogistic analyses.
- Demonstrate an understanding of the various kinds of fallacious reasoning
- Demonstrate the ability to identify fallacious reasoning in areas such as but not limited to the news, politics, advertising and culture.
- State and explain the definitions of these fallacies.
- Identify and explain the presence of these fallacies when given various arguments and texts
Add to Portfolio (opens a new window)
|
|